Masha, I never mentioned that women don't earn more than $600 a month, or a week, or a pay period. All I said is that to pay somebody what the person placing the ad asked, it takes a half of the income of somebody say in middle management position. Let's say a middle manager earns 50K a year, that's roughly $24/hour. Roughly. There are 80 worked hours in a pay period, 160 hours a month. Again, roughly. $24*160=$3840. Let's assume a 22% tax rate, so the monthly pay is reduced to $2995. Then, there are 401K contributions. Let's say 10% a month (although many people contribute 15%). So that's another $300. So, what you now have left, roughly, is $2700. So, paying a nanny let's say $1300 (if you consider that adequate) a month means you are giving away half of your after-tax and after 401K earnings. I am not even factoring in the cost of health insurance premiums. Let's assume the husband carries the health insurance. Also do keep in mind that a woman needs to spend $$ to get to work, such as gasoline, wear and tear on the car, not to mention professional attire.
What I am trying to say that it only makes sense for a mother to go back to work full time if (either one of the reasons, or all of them):
1. This is her CAREER.
2. She has a high earning potential.
3. The family will not survive without her income.
4. She gets some sort of fullfillment from her job (saving the world etc...)
Otherwise, it makes no sense (at least to me) to go back to work.
As far as getting out of the house goes, a part-time nanny or a learning center where kids could go to for a couple hours a day should do the trick. Women can even get out and do some volunteer work for personal fulfillment, if that's what is necessary.
Masha, how many children do you have and what age? Do you have a nanny?
Русалочка,
Мамы, которые работают не ради денег, а ради того, чтобы выбраться из 4х стен не ищут няню на полный день на 4-5 дней. Данное обьявление подразумевает, что родители отсутствуют в течение рабочего дня.